// you’re reading...

Leadership

Preaching


Christianity is par excellence the religion of the
Word. When we speak, we disclose ourselves: so does God. God has
spoken in various ways – nature, history, conscience, prophets
and ultimately in his Son (Hebrews 1:1,2). Jesus Christ IS God’s
word to us. God also speaks through the written word, the Bible.
And the word of the Lord comes to us in the living voice of the
church as it proclaims, preaches and teaches.


‘Going to worship’ is more than ‘going to preaching’.
The question we Protestants hear from someone who missed church
was, ‘What did the preacher say?’


Preaching is not done well in many churches. Homilies
in many ‘liturgical’ churches are polite sermonic essays which
won’t offend – or change – anybody. Well-educated preachers in
some mainline churches fill their sermons with theological abstractions.
Pentecostal preaching is often a loud reiteration of exhortations
lacking theological substance. And other churches which may have
better preaching often don’t know how to be ‘lost in wonder, love
and praise’ in their worship.


Good preaching on its own will not fill churches
anymore, but bad preaching will empty them. The preacher stands
between heaven and earth, speaking for God to us, and strengthening
our faith, hope and love. Good preaching is inspired and inspiring,
bringing the Bible to life, and life to the Bible: it is rooted
in the biblical text but relevant to our needs. It is interesting,
warm, ‘confessional’ (the preacher is a sinner needing grace too),
dialogical and interactive. Preaching, according to Phillips Brooks’
famous dictum is ‘communicating truth through personality’. The
best preachers are ‘bilingual’, understanding the terminology
of theology, but also communicating plainly in the language of
the people.


May I suggest three essential characteristics of
authentic preaching:


1. GOOD PREACHING IS DRAMATIC


‘Baby Boomers’ – those born after World War II, between
1946 and 1964 – are the first adults to be raised on the mass
media. Television, radio, rock music and computers have shaped
the way they view reality. Yet George Gallup’s research says 99%
of young Americans are ‘religious’ in some sense, and 40 per cent
say they’re ‘born again’. But they don’t feel at home in the traditional
church; it’s boring, quite frankly. They don’t like rigid structures,
old-fashioned music, or the church’s conservative politics. One
33 year old pastor of a large church in Colorado said: ‘The church
is the last standing barrier between our generation and Jesus.’


So preaching to baby-boomers and young people will
have to be relevant and interesting – and dramatic. Study Tony
Campolo’s ‘sermons’ for an example of superb communication to
these groups.


One way to reach these generations is through stories.
Parables, stories, are good preaching in any culture and to any
age-group. They appeal to the imagination. More than half of the
Bible – both Old and New Testaments – is narrative. Stories communicate
images and pictures, to which hearers then attach their own feelings,
emotions and experiences. Stories open windows to life. They help
us get in touch with hope, compassion, love, the triumph of good
over evil, light over darkness.


Try something different sometimes. How about a sermon
preached from behind the congregation, or from the middle of a
row, or with a child in your arms? If preaching about the prodigal
son, maybe interview the various people in the prodigal’s family
(including a neighbour and the family’s pastor!). I heard of one
re-enactment of this story which ended with the elder brother
hitting his father: quite unforgettable! But don’t be ‘gimmicky’
for its own sake: always explain the reason for changes. Does
the sermon always have to come ‘after half-time’? Can it be broken
up sometimes, and interspersed with other worship-activities to
reinforce the main points made?


2. GOOD PREACHING IS DIDACTIC


That is, it must have a teaching component. But good
preaching is not simply imparting information. It aims at ‘transformation’.


How do we mature in our faith and life? How do we
develop a sensitive Christian conscience, a strong desire to live
obediently to the word of God, a love for Bible study and prayer,
a dedicated commitment to ministries of evangelism, mercy and
justice? A discussion of teaching must work backwards from these
questions.


When asked ‘What or who were the formative influences
in your life?’ most people name a parent or teacher. ‘I teach’
says US professor of the year 1983, Peter Beidler, ‘because I
see people grow and change in front of my eyes. Being a teacher
is being present at the creation, when the clay begins to breathe.
Nothing is more exciting than being nearby when the breathing
begins… I teach because, being around people who are beginning
to breathe, I occasionally find myself catching my breath with
them.’


Paul and Barnabas majored on teaching (Acts 11:26).
The church at Antioch had a list of their teachers (Acts 13:1:
does yours?). The religion of Israel was a teaching religion (see
eg Exodus 18:20, Deuteronomy 6:1): the law of Moses was first
a lesson, then a command. Jesus was a rabbi, a teacher (eg Mark
1:38), and commanded his followers to go into the world and teach
all nations (Matthew 28:19-20). The early Christian churches took
seriously the function of teaching (Acts 13:1, 1 Corinthians 12:28,
Ephesians 4:11, 2 Timothy 1:11).


The purpose of Timothy’s teaching, Paul says, is
to ‘arouse the love that comes from a pure heart, a clear conscience,
and a genuine faith’ (1 Timothy 1:5). ‘Bible teaching’ is therefore
much more than a ‘jug to mug’ approach: it’s meant to produce
better-behaved rather than merely better-informed Christians.
Christian leaders should be able, or apt to teach (1 Timothy 3:2).


If you could choose one verb to describe what the
pastor/s do in your church, would it be ‘teaching’? In churches
battling to survive, the leaders spend their time ‘oiling the
church’s machinery’ or ‘keeping the people happy’ through routine
visitation (so-called ‘maintenance’ ministries). But where the
‘pastor-teachers’ (Ephesians 4:11) take their teaching role seriously,
they use many means to encourage their people to mature in the
faith, serve others, and become ‘reproducers’. Pastoring and teaching
go together: we don’t teach theory, we teach persons. The best
teachers love those they instruct, model what they teach (‘truthing
it in love’ as Paul puts it in Ephesians 4:15), are enthusiastic,
hard-working and systematic in their preparation, and always assume
their students will teach others (2 Timothy 2:2).


Preaching without teaching can be propaganda: by-passing
people’s minds to get them to make a commitment they don’t fully
understand. And teaching without persuasion can be dry, sterile
dogma.


The teaching process will be ‘dialogical’, as John
R W Stott put it (pp 60ff). It will be inductive and deductive,
propositional and relational, doctrinal and life-centred, from
the pulpit, in classes, in small groups, and one-to-one. Every
church ought to have a bookstall (positioned where people will
fall over it!); and an audio and video cassette library. Perhaps
small-group studies can be related to the whole church’s theme
for the week, where the sermon is followed up by discussion. (That’s
better than the reverse order: experience shows too many will
come with their exegetical – and critical – minds made up to truly
hear the voice of the Lord in the preaching).


When we hear the Scripture read we are listening
to the voice of the living God. We don’t listen to the Bible reading
simply to learn something interesting. Our silent prayer is always
‘Beyond the sacred page I seek you, Lord. My Spirit yearns for
you, O Living Word.’ The Bible readings should be somewhere near
the preaching, to make clear the connection. I like the discipline
of the lectionary; it ensures our readings and preaching range
over the whole Bible. But don’t follow it slavishly: in biblically
literate congregations there is merit in preaching consecutively
through various books of the Bible, with rotating themes from
Old Testament, Gospel, and Epistle, interspersed with ‘special
days’ (Trinity Sunday, Pentecost, Advent, Christmas, Easter etc).
The reading of scripture should be done well. In some churches
the Bible reading is as exciting as if someone read a telephone
directory! Train your readers. Introduce the reading with a sentence
or two describing its background. Use drama, dance, mime, and
audio-visuals to assist in ‘sitting where the readers first sat’.
God wants his word understood; the scriptures were written in
the common languages of their day, so use a translation closest
to the language we speak (eg. the New Revised Standard Version).
After Scripture is read, be silent to listen with the heart.


3. GOOD PREACHING IS PROPHETIC


This is hardest for pastors. This week I have been
re-reading Reinhold Niebuhr’s ‘Leaves from the Notebooks of a
Tamed Cynic’. If ever there was a twentieth century prophet par
excellence it was Niebuhr. About prophets he writes that they’re
likely to be itinerants (‘we preachers are afraid to tell the
truth because we are economically dependent upon the people of
the church’ p.74). And ‘the church does not seem to realize how
unethical a conventionally respectable life may be’ (p.118). So
it’s easier for pastors to preach about charity than justice.
But it’s difficult for a pastor to be prophetic without being
cynical (‘I don’t want anyone to be more cynical than I am’ p.158).
If you have to choose between bitterness and blandness, choose
the former; but ‘speaking the truth in love’ is always our aim…


To understand all this, let’s take a short excursion
into the sociology of institutions. Max Weber used the term ‘prophetic’
in opposition to the terms ‘tradition’ and ‘institution’. All
institutions, said sociologist Robert Merton, are inherently degenerative.
In the church, only prophets can really ‘see’ it – which is why
they’re sometimes called ‘seers’. Over time, a representative
institution will see people inhabit, roughly one of four stances
if they have to face institutional change. On the left, radicals
want to change everything (they’re mostly driven by anger). On
the right, traditionalists want to change nothing (they’re driven
by fear). Next to the radicals, progressives want to change some
things, and to the right of them are conservatives, who are prepared
to change very little. Now if you’re going to lead this motley
group, you have to be somewhere in the middle: if you’re too radical
the traditionalists/conservatives (who have the power mostly)
will throw you out. But if you’re not ‘with it’, you’ll be left
behind in an irrelevant backwater. So pastors, for example, to
survive, must appear to be not too radical and not too traditionalist.


But prophets are always radical. There’s the rub.
Remember Woody Allen’s movie about Leonard Zelig? Filmed in documentary
style, Zelig purportedly recounts the life and times of a ‘chameleon
man’ who was so completely compliant than his physical appearance
changed to accomodate his companions. Talking to some Orthodox
rabbis, he sprouts a beard and side curls. In a Chinese laundry
his features become Asian. To psychiatrists he utters much psychobabble…


Good preaching has both heat and light: heat without
light leaves us scorched and brittle; light may help us ‘see’
(and as Horace Bushnell once said, there can be no preaching worth
the name if there is no thinking), but knowledge without faith
won’t save anybody. W B Yeats in his poem ‘The Second Coming’
says ‘the best lack all conviction’ while ‘the worst are full
of passionate intensity.’ We must search for the dividing line
between enthusiasm and fanaticism…


Good preaching touches mind and heart and will: we
learn, we love, and we change. It goes without saying that good
preaching is not constantly negative, opposing anything and everything.
We shepherds sometimes spend too much time mending fences rather
than feeding sheep. There ought always to be a prophetic dimension
to our preaching, calling us to repentance.


The ministry of prophets was very important in New
Testament times. Paul regarded it highly, urging the Corinthians
to seek this highly prized spiritual gift (1 Corinthians 14:1,
39). Paul wanted them all to speak in tongues, but even more to
prophesy. Why? Because tongues helps the individual; prophecy
helps the church. In the three lists of church ministries (Romans
12, 1 Corinthians 12 and Ephesians 4) only one ministry is mentioned
in all of them – the prophetic.


Prophecy is a direct communication from God for a
particular people at a particular time and place, for a particular
purpose. Prophecy gives the church fresh insights into God’s truth
(Ephesians 3), of guidance about the future (Acts 11:27ff), or
encouragement (1 Corinthians 14:3; 1 Timothy 1:18), or inspiration
or correction. It either edifies the church or brings it under
judgment (‘God is in this place!’ – see 1 Corinthians 14:25).
The biblical prophets combined judgment with hope. Their messages
were sometimes very challenging: prophets ‘disturb the comfortable’
while pastors ‘comfort the disturbed’! Prophets ‘tell it like
it is’.


Paul told the Thessalonians not to despise prophesyings
(‘inspired messages’ 1 Thessalonians 5:20-22) but ‘put all things
to the test: keep what is good and avoid every kind of evil.’


Hans Kung has written: ‘[A church in which the prophets
are not heard] ‘declines and becomes a spiritless organization;
outwardly everything may seem all right, things run smoothly,
according to plan and along ordered paths… but inwardly it will
be a place where the Spirit can no longer blow when and where
he wills.’ (The Church, London: Burns and Oates, 1968, p.433)


In true worship God speaks, we answer, God speaks
again, we respond. ‘The Lord said to [Jeremiah]’… ‘I answered…’
‘But the Lord said to me…’ (Jeremiah 1:4-7). ‘I heard the Lord
say, "Whom shall I send? Who will be our messenger?"
I answered, "I will go! Send me!" So he told me to go…’
(Isaiah 6:8-9).


Over and over in the Bible God tells us he is not
pleased with worship that’s just words or formulas, and does not
lead to a changed life. Indeed if worship does not change us it
is not true worship. As Jesus, God’s Word, was totally obedient
to the will of his Father, so we must respond with our total selves
(Romans 12:1,2).


Being ‘saved’ is more than ‘receiving Jesus as your
personal Saviour’ (an expression, incidentally, that’s not in
the Bible). Biblical salvation/wholeness includes justice and
mercy as well (Matthew 23:23, Luke 11:42). ‘Take away from me
the noise of your songs! …But let justice roll down like an
ever-flowing stream.’ (Amos 5:24). ‘I cannot tolerate your…
festivals. When you lift your hands in prayer, I will hide my
eyes from you. Though you offer countless prayers I will not listen…
Cease to do evil and learn to do right. Pursue justice and champion
the oppressed…’ (Isaiah 1:14ff. see also Mark 7:6-8).


To sum up: good preaching ‘exalts Christ’: our response
is not ‘what great oratory!’ but ‘what a great Saviour!’ In a
moving article in The Christian Century (August 24, 1994) Martin
Copenhaver describes his last sermon to his congregation. He preached
on the text ‘Who do people say that I am…? But who do you say
that I am?’


‘The first question is as easy for us as it was for
the Twelve. As Casey Stengel used to say, "You could look
it up". And you can answer a question like that without offending
anyone… A scholar can answer that question historically or sociologically.
A preacher can answer it with a sermon packed with quotes from
Schillebeeckx and Crossan. It does not ask for commitment of any
kind. But then comes the second question: "Who do you say
that I am?" Only one word is different, but that one word
makes all the difference. There is no escape into comfortable
objectivity. This question demands not so much the insight of
our minds as the allegience of our lives…’


Copenhaver mentioned a conference when evangelist
Michael Green asked a the clergy: ‘When was the last time you
told your congregation what Jesus means to you?’ The question
haunted him. So he told his people, on the last day of his ministry
with them.


‘At the conclusion of that sermon I stood at the
door and shook hands with the congregation. One woman, a beloved
saint of the church, came to the head of the line but was so overcome
with emotion that she could not speak and went to the back of
the line. I assumed that she simply did not know how to say goodbye.
But when she finally reached me again, her voice cracked slightly
as she asked, "Why didn’t you tell us this before?"’


Well…?


Further Reading: Walter Brueggemann, Finally Comes
the Poet: Daring Speech for Proclamation (Fortress Press, 1989);
John Claypool, The Preaching Event, (Word Books, 1980); The Light
Within You, (Word Books 1983); Fred B. Craddock, Preaching, (Abingdon
1985); Rowland Croucher, Your Church Can Come Alive (Melbourne:
John Mark Ministries, 1996); Michael Duduit (ed.), Handbook of
Contemporary Preaching, (Broadman 1992); Bill Hybels, Stuart Briscoe,
Haddon Robinson, Mastering Contemporary Preaching (IVP, 1989);
Reinhold Niebuhr, Leaves from the Notebooks of a Tamed Cynic,
(Meridian, 1960); John R W Stott, Between Two Worlds: The Art
of Preaching in the Twentieth Century, Michigan (Eerdmans, 1982);
William Willimon, Richard Lischer eds., Concise Encyclopedia of
Preaching (John Knox Press 1995).


Rowland Croucher

Discussion

Comments are disallowed for this post.

Comments are closed.